Our Position
AI Is Used — Intentionally, Transparently, and Under Human Oversight
PhysioLogic Softworks does use artificial intelligence. It is used intentionally, transparently, and under direct human oversight as part of the company’s broader approach to quality, review, and accountability.
AI is treated as an assistive tool, not an autonomous decision-maker. Its role is to help extend the working capacity of a small team, not to replace human judgment, expertise, or responsibility.
How AI Is Used
Where AI Can Help
AI may assist with research support, drafting, language refinement, organizational assistance, and software development support.
In research-related work, AI may help surface directions for inquiry, organize material, or accelerate early-stage synthesis. In writing-related work, it may help with structure, phrasing, language cleanup, and formatting. In development-related work, it may assist with code generation, implementation support, or workflow acceleration.
Research support
Drafting
Language refinement
Organizational assistance
Software development support
Human Review and Verification
AI Outputs Are Never Accepted at Face Value
Human review is the central control point. AI-generated research outputs are not accepted at face value. Source materials, factual claims, interpretations, and conclusions are manually reviewed and validated by humans.
AI may assist with writing, language, structure, and formatting, but final content is substantially reviewed, revised, and edited by humans before release.
AI may also assist in software development, but AI-generated code is reviewed, tested, and vetted by humans before it is relied on in released work.
What AI Does Not Do
Clear Boundaries
AI is never permitted to independently create, approve, or publish final work. It is not allowed to act as an autonomous decision-maker in the company’s released educational, editorial, or software output.
Independently approving final work
Independently publishing final work
Acting as an autonomous decision-maker
Final Accountability
Responsibility for Released Work Remains Human
Final responsibility for all released materials remains with human reviewers. That includes responsibility for factual accuracy, interpretation, quality assurance, editorial judgment, software reliability, and publication decisions.
AI is a force-multiplying tool. It is not a replacement for human expertise, accountability, or quality assurance.
